On the “Brink” – Advisory Panel Decides on
Guidelines for Intervention
By Mathavi Sankar in Baltimore (People’s Daily)
The Advisory Panel is a special committee of experts
that counsels the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on specific issues.
Currently, these experts are discussing the timely issue of guidelines for UNSC
intervention.
The United Nations enforces “laws of war” that
stipulate when it is justifiable for nations to engage in war, and what acts
are acceptable in wartime. “Intervention” is the term for the use of force by a
nation in the internal or external affairs of another; in most cases, this is
considered unlawful, but in certain cases intervention can be justified.
However, the international standard for acceptable
intervention is uncertain. Under the provisions of the Security Council
Charter, the UNSC is empowered to authorize the use of force to maintain
‘international peace and security’, but there is still controversy about the
extent to which the Council can use force in humanitarian emergencies.
International law has yet to fully reflect the emerging idea that intervention
is a legitimate exception to the laws of sovereignty and that use of force
might be necessary when human rights are at stake.
In addition to the ambiguity surrounding the
intervention process (military, economic, or humanitarian), when intervention
should occur is also unclear. Currently, the experts on the Advisory Panel are
defining the “brink,” or the point at which the UNSC should intervene. Some experts
believe that intervention before an atrocity occurs is the best way to prevent
human rights violations. However, others raise the practical question of how
the UNSC can decide that an act will lead to human rights violations. These
delegates argue that humanitarian principles differ from country-to-country and
that deciding based on an international standard is infringing upon national
sovereignty. Expert Li Keqiang, Premier of the State Council of the People’s
Republic of China, states “Every country has the right to govern its people in
its own way. It is dangerous to define the “brink” based on imperialistic
Western views.” Thus, experts must carefully identify and define the thin line
between necessary intervention and infringement upon national sovereignty.
Assigned word count: 350
Actual word count: 355
No comments:
Post a Comment